<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time to call it a day, IE6!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.donotfold.be/716/time-to-call-it-a-day-ie6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.donotfold.be/716/time-to-call-it-a-day-ie6/</link>
	<description>story of my life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:52:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Samzzi</title>
		<link>http://www.donotfold.be/716/time-to-call-it-a-day-ie6/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>Samzzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.donotfold.be/?p=716#comment-499</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a dangerous thing to call IE6 users dumb if you ask me :)

Long discussion about this topic: http://usability-blog.be/ie6-internet-explorer-6-niet-welkom/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a dangerous thing to call IE6 users dumb if you ask me :)</p>
<p>Long discussion about this topic: <a href="http://usability-blog.be/ie6-internet-explorer-6-niet-welkom/" rel="nofollow">http://usability-blog.be/ie6-internet-explorer-6-niet-welkom/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inferis</title>
		<link>http://www.donotfold.be/716/time-to-call-it-a-day-ie6/comment-page-1/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>Inferis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.donotfold.be/?p=716#comment-498</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it is about getting your network secure and trouble free (IE6 is hardly a problem is you control what&#039;s coming in, which is usually the case in large organisations).
The problem is intranet applications specificially developed for IE6, and where an upgrade of the browser would require modifications to those apps. Which brings a cost (which, depending on the implementation, might be small or large).
When faced with this, the decisionmakers take the cheapest option: leave IE6 where it is. It costs no extra money, because the security measures are taken anyway (irregardless of any browser issues).

At least, that has been my experience in large corps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it is about getting your network secure and trouble free (IE6 is hardly a problem is you control what&#8217;s coming in, which is usually the case in large organisations).<br />
The problem is intranet applications specificially developed for IE6, and where an upgrade of the browser would require modifications to those apps. Which brings a cost (which, depending on the implementation, might be small or large).<br />
When faced with this, the decisionmakers take the cheapest option: leave IE6 where it is. It costs no extra money, because the security measures are taken anyway (irregardless of any browser issues).</p>
<p>At least, that has been my experience in large corps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
